> -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 10:01 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Interim Build Location > > > Done as to 1.2.1: > > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/struts/v1.2.1 > > If we announce 1.2.1 (or 1.2.2 with ##27332) to the USER list as > a Beta, does it have to be signed and such?
I believe it should be, yes. > I only ask since I still need to get setup for signing these things. I can take care of that right now, if you want. -- Martin Cooper > > -Ted. > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:54:02 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > In catching up on back email, I noticed a piece of advice about > > where to put interim builds that should be made available to the > > public for review, but are not official signed releases (which > > would go to http://www.apache.org/dist). The suggestion from > > infrastructure was to use: > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/ > > > > which has the dual advantages (over someone's arbitrary home > > directory) of implying that "this is likely to become a release > > unless there are fatal problems with it", and it doesn't go out to > > the mirror networks. I suggest we use this approach for release > > candidates (and alpha/beta voted releases) until they are voted GA. > > > > Craig > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
