Date: 2004-09-18T19:51:51
   Editor: SteveRaeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogDispatchUtil
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogDispatchUtil

   no comment

Change Log:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1,15 +1,9 @@
 ##language:en
 == Universal Button Utility for Struts ==
 
-(Critics please use Critics Corner at the end of this post.  Thank you.)
-
 There is a persistent problem of handling multiple buttons, and this is especially a 
problem when the buttons are images.  Struts has provided a solution for this with 
DispatchAction and its progeny.  There are various other solutions.  I have provided 
one at StrutsCatalogImageTagUtil.  I have actually provided two solutions there. The 
following solution is, I think, superior in every way.  What it does is to merge the 
best parts of StrutsCataglogImageTagUtil and DispatchAction.  
 
-This is a solution for Struts.  If you want a solution independent of Struts, again, 
please see StrutsCatalogImageTagUtil.  The principle reason for this class is the 
problem with <input type='image' name='whatever'> tags in HTML.  Those tag send the 
values in the name attribute as ''whatever.x=9'' and ''whatever.y=26''.  
DispatchAction and its progeny provide a melange of solutions but no common way to 
deal with ''<a href='whatever.do'>'', ''<input type='submit'>'', ''<input 
type='image'>'', ''<input type='file'>'', or whatever.  This class, DispatchUtil does 
that.  If you prefer to use a subclass, just provide the functionality in this class 
in a class extending Action.  Herbert Rabago came up with the idea of providing the 
functionality in a utility class and I really like that idea.  So, here we go, after a 
caveat.
-
-== Caveat Lector ==
-
-For those who have used MappedDispatchAction and LookupDispatchAction, this solution 
will do everything that you are doing. You have to understand, however, which many 
people seem to have a really, really, really hard time doing, that there is a 
fundamental shift in how the logic in this class, DispatchUtil and its prior class 
SimpleDispatchAction, cf. StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction, work.  There are those 
who want to say the equivalent of "0 is just another number, so there is no big change 
here".  I cannot continue to try and awake them from their dogmatic slumbers.  Let me 
just say for the last time that the change from mining, getting, obtaining, etc. the 
name from the name/value request parameter pair is a significant change that makes 
DispatchUtil lighter, more flexible and less coupled in every respect.  People 
continue to argue and to insist that this class won't work as coded when it is doing 
fine in actual sites.
+This is a solution for Struts.  If you want a solution independent of Struts, again, 
please see StrutsCatalogImageTagUtil.  The principle reason for this class is the 
problem with <input type='image' name='whatever'> tags in HTML.  Those tag send the 
values in the name attribute as ''whatever.x=9'' and ''whatever.y=26''.  
DispatchAction and its progeny provide a melange of solutions but no common way to 
deal with ''<a href='whatever.do'>'', ''<input type='submit'>'', ''<input 
type='image'>'', ''<input type='file'>'', or whatever.  This class, DispatchUtil does 
that.  If you prefer to use a subclass, just provide the functionality in this class 
in a class extending Action.  Herbert Rabago came up with the idea of providing the 
functionality in a utility class and I really like that idea.  So, here we go.
 
 == Code ==
 {{{
@@ -172,8 +166,3 @@
 StrutsCatalogHidingImagesAndOtherResourcesUnderWEBINF
 
 StrutsCatalogMappedBeans
-
-
-== Critics Corner ==
-
-If you don't like what is said or presented, and you want to advance your ideas, 
please don't make this presentation a mess by doing it here.  Please be respectful and 
provide a link here to your ideas or initiate another space.  Multiple authors 
fundamentally in disagreement make a page unreadable.  This page had to be moved from 
StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction because of such problems.  Please don't repeat them 
here.  I love to read them but I  love to keep things readable too.  Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to