DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31509>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31509 html:javascript tag doesn't work right with jsFunctionName set [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Major |Enhancement ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 19:31 ------- You're right, I didn't notice that server side you are still using the standard 'required' validator - I focused on the javascript. I agree with you its confusing and there arnen't any docs telling people how to code their own validators - but then again, the existing validators are fairly good models for people who want to implement their own. This is only an issue, because you want to use the standard stuff server side and your own custom stuff client side. Simplest approach IMO, would be to set up your own validateRequiredFullMsg method which just calls the FieldChecks.validateRequired() method. I agree with you that documenting it would be good - if you fancy submitting a patch for the user guide, that would be great. Alternatively, you could set up a "How To" on the wiki which would also be good. The reason the original patch can't be done is not because of backward compatibility, its because the javascript isn't part of Struts - you would need to get Commons Validator to change the naming of the two types of functions first. Having said that, neither that approach or adding another 'method' name don't seem worth it to me - I've changed this to an enhancement rquest and I'll leave it open in case someone else thinks differently and picks it up. Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
