James Mitchell wrote:
Since you have not responded, Martin, I will assume for the moment that
you agree with the foregoing.
Michael, now why would you think that Michael? Is this your policy when participating in a public forum Michael? Did it ever occur to you that some people, Michael, are just tired of corresponding with you Michael?
Perhaps it would be worth pointing out, however, that I said nothing about what I /thought/. I said I would /assume /something for the moment in order to make a point which followed. If you pay no attention to the point, you won't get why I would make the assumption, which is quite different than having the thought.
What did you think of the point? That would interest me more than your communications point. You are a recognized expert in Struts and I value your opinion in that area.
Michael McGrady
