On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:12:55 -0700, Michael McGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > > >>Since you have not responded, Martin, I will assume for the moment that > >>you agree with the foregoing. > >> > >> > > > >Michael, now why would you think that Michael? Is this your policy when > >participating in a public forum Michael? Did it ever occur to you that some > >people, Michael, are just tired of corresponding with you Michael? > > > > > > > >-- > >James Mitchell > >Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > >EdgeTech, Inc. > >678.910.8017 > >AIM: jmitchtx > > > > Do you have anything to say on the issue, Jim? If so, I would be more > than happy to read it. > > Michael > >
Sorry for the traffic, however, Michael, you are taking some liberties with James' name, aren't you? I have never seen him sign a message with 'Jim'. I would consider addressing James in this manner as impolite, until/unless he has 'introduced' himself this way. This may not bother James, but I find it disrespectful and incredibly irritating. Susan [getting off her soapbox] Bradeen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
