On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:23:36 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html > > I believe the Jakarta guidelines are the sort of thing that the board refers to as > the project bylaws, like the ones posted here: > > * http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html > > Perhaps we should just rely on the checklist to detail our release process. > > We could drop the references to other people's guidelines and follow our own > checklist and remarks. > > I've added a proposed release checklist template to the website, but left it > unlinked. > > * http://struts.apache.org/release-checklist.html
+1 (with the corrected link to the HTTPD guidelines ;) -- Martin Cooper > -Ted. > > On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:59:28 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html > > > > ^^ Link to Tomcat Procedures ^^ > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html > > > > ^^ Overall Tomcat Guidelines ^^ > > > > I updated the releases documentation to point to the Tomcat > > Procedures. AFAICT the remainder of the release notes look good. > > Feel free to disagree. The Tomcat docs talk about a release plan. > > Although they don't specifically say one is required, the docs are > > written in such a way that the presumption of one is implied. > > > > ... not real sure where Craig's bullets would get merged to, but > > someone else is welcome to do that if they have thoughts on that. > > It seems redundant to that that there though - it's information > > that's already there. > > > > Eddie > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:50 AM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was > > Adopt ...] > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:23:05 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote: > >> Most of my concerns are in the Release Guidelines. It's ambiguous > >> to say any release should follow the guidelines of both tomcat > >> and httpd. They're decidedly different with respect to where the > >> emphasis is placed. > >> > > > > If someone can provide a link to the Tomcat Guidelines, we could > > drop the link to HTTPD. > > > > Or, someone could merge Craig's bullets: > > > > ---- > > > > * Post what amounts to a release candidate and > > announce to a limited audience (dev and user > > lists) asking for testing. > > > > * Testing ensues ... > > > > * Call a vote on the release, with the options > > to call it alpha, beta, stable (that's fine > > with me), or withdraw (if there was some > > bad problem). > > > > * Announce to the world and do the usual process > > of distributing the bits. > > > > ---- > > > > with the "Additional remarks" on the Release Guidelines page, to > > create our own version. > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --- > > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. > > Virus Database (VPS): 0444-3, 10/29/2004 > > Tested on: 10/30/2004 12:59:29 AM > > avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. > > http://www.avast.com > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
