Now that looks pretty cool!
It's fee-based, though, right?
Anyone taken a look at it?
cheers,
David
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Craig McClanahan |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | om> |
| | |
| | 11/04/2004 12:50 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | "Struts |
| | Developers List" |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> |
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF,
Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: |
| Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])
|
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:43:41 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is a really interesting statement. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I've
> always thought the whole point of JSF was visual components. Yet the
> statement above clearly indicates that JSF goes well beyond that
> charter, and clearly suggests that there are facets of JSF that should
> not be a part of that JSR.
FWIW, here is IBM's take on how to build rich web applications using
JSF components plus a framework for sending data back and forth:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0411_hasson/0411_hasson.html?ca=dnp-344
Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
