As mentioned, we can always tag and roll additional releases from the 1.2.x branch. It's just a question of how much we want to cross-commit between 1.3.x and 1.2.x.
Right now, I'd say cross-committing this patch is the lesser of the two evils. When validator 1.1.4 goes GA, I'd personally commit to rolling 1.2.7, especially if we also get a patch for #23127 too. -Ted. On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:54:35 +0000, Niall Pemberton wrote: > The issue is that Validator was missed out when message bundles was > implemented in Struts - I'd prefer we wait for Validator 1.1.4 and > fix #18169 and #21760 and that hole will then be plugged in the > 1.2.x series. > > If we were carrying on in the 1.2.x series, then releasing 1.2.6 > and leaving them till next time would be fine by me - but since > we're moving on to a 1.3 branch IMO it would be a good idea to > include this in the last 1.2 release. > > Theres been no -ve feedback from anyone on Validator 1.1.4 so > hopefully it will be voted GA in the next couple of days - can we > really not delay a week for the 1.2.6 version and include this > stuff? > > Niall > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:52 PM > Subject: Re: Release planning (was Re: Shale vs. Struts-Chain) > > > If everything else is resolved, I don't think we need to wait on > Validator 1.1.4. If it's ready when we are, fine. If not, #18169 > does not seem like a "showstopper" issue to me, and we can finish > implementing the feature in the 1.3.x series. > > I'm trying to resolve the issues not listed as "outstanding" on the > release plan, which should put us in a position to roll 1.2.6. > > I would be in favor of immediately branching at 1.2.6, regardless, > so we can start on 1.3.x. If there are any straggling issues with > the 1.2.x build, I'd be happy to cross-commit between the 1.2.x and > 1.3.x branches. We've let 1.2.x block 1.3.x long enough, and it's > time to "move on to bigger and better things". > > We did tag and roll 1.2.5, it just didn't go anyplace, which is > going to happen now and again. > > -Ted. > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:21:30 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: >>> Seams that Chain is only for Struts 1.2 ? >>> or 1.3, which is based on Servlet2.2 >>> >> I believe that we reached consensus that it would be ok to move >> Struts 1.3 to depend on Servlet 2.3. Work on Struts 1.3 is >> blocked on the release of a GA 1.2.x Struts so as to minimize any >> need to apply patches across both branches. >> >> Looking at http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126, is it >> true that we are just waiting for commons-validator 1.1.4 to be >> marked "GA"? The other bugs all seem to be marked for 1.3 except >> one which is underspecified. >> >> Should we somehow annotate this page: >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease125 to indicate that >> there isn't going to be a 1.2.5 release? Or should we have a vote >> on it even though 1.2.6 is brewing? >> >> Joe > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
