As mentioned, we can always tag and roll additional releases from the 1.2.x branch. It's just a question of how much we want to cross-commit between 1.3.x and 1.2.x.
Right now, I'd say cross-committing this patch is the lesser of the two evils. When validator 1.1.4 goes GA, I'd personally commit to rolling 1.2.7, especially if we also get a patch for #23127 too. -Ted. On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:54:35 +0000, Niall Pemberton wrote: >�The issue is that Validator was missed out when message bundles was >�implemented in Struts - I'd prefer we wait for Validator 1.1.4 and >�fix #18169 and �#21760 and that hole will then be plugged in the >�1.2.x series. > >�If we were carrying on in the 1.2.x series, then releasing 1.2.6 >�and leaving them till next time would be fine by me - but since >�we're moving on to a 1.3 branch IMO it would be a good idea to >�include this in the last 1.2 release. > >�Theres been no -ve feedback from anyone on Validator 1.1.4 so >�hopefully it will be voted GA in the next couple of days - can we >�really not delay a week for the 1.2.6 version and include this >�stuff? > >�Niall > >�----- Original Message ----- >�From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >�To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >�Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:52 PM >�Subject: Re: Release planning (was Re: Shale vs. Struts-Chain) > > >�If everything else is resolved, I don't think we need to wait on >�Validator 1.1.4. If it's ready when we are, fine. If not, #18169 >�does not seem like a "showstopper" issue to me, and we can finish >�implementing the feature in the 1.3.x series. > >�I'm trying to resolve the issues not listed as "outstanding" on the >�release plan, which should put us in a position to roll 1.2.6. > >�I would be in favor of immediately branching at 1.2.6, regardless, >�so we can start on 1.3.x. If there are any straggling issues with >�the 1.2.x build, I'd be happy to cross-commit between the 1.2.x and >�1.3.x branches. We've let 1.2.x block 1.3.x long enough, and it's >�time to "move on to bigger and better things". > >�We did tag and roll 1.2.5, it just didn't go anyplace, which is >�going to happen now and again. > >�-Ted. > >�On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:21:30 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: >>>�Seams that Chain is only for Struts 1.2 ? >>>�or 1.3, which is based on Servlet2.2 >>> >>�I believe that we reached consensus that it would be ok to move >>�Struts 1.3 to depend on Servlet 2.3. Work on Struts 1.3 is >>�blocked on the release of a GA 1.2.x Struts so as to minimize any >>�need to apply patches across both branches. >> >>�Looking at http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126, is it >>�true that we are just waiting for commons-validator 1.1.4 to be >>�marked "GA"? The other bugs all seem to be marked for 1.3 except >>�one which is underspecified. >> >>�Should we somehow annotate this page: >>�http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease125 to indicate that >>�there isn't going to be a 1.2.5 release? Or should we have a vote >>�on it even though 1.2.6 is brewing? >> >>�Joe > > >�-------------------------------------------------------------------- >�- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >�additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >�-------------------------------------------------------------------- >�- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >�additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
