You don't wanna know how much disk that first checkout ate! Ugh!
Thanks! :-)
Eddie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: SVN Updates
What I did was wipe out my previous tree and check out struts/*/trunk only - no branches and tags. (I don't believe there's a way to do what I just said literally, though - I had to do four separate checkouts to do that. ;) I also didn't retain the 'trunk' in my local path names, since there didn't seem much point (at least until I'm trying to work on multiple branches at the same time).
-- Martin Cooper
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:00:49 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:What's the best (ie. quickest, most painless) way to update one's local SVN repository when there are significant structural changes?
I had the bright idea to wipe mine and start fresh. Thank GOD I only asked for core! The branches are killing me!
It's too bad SVN doesn't diff things. Then, I suppose that's one of the things folks like about SVN over CVS.
Thanks :-)
Eddie
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0447-1, 11/19/2004 Tested on: 11/21/2004 10:00:52 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0447-1, 11/19/2004 Tested on: 11/21/2004 10:43:32 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
