On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:38:54 -0800 (PST), David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My basic concern is that we're heading down a path that doesn't simplify > things for Struts users (including myself in that group) and instead using > the next shiny technology in front of us. If Spring and/or JSF simplify > using Struts, then I wholeheartedly support using them. But first we need > to show how they accomplish that and not just use them because they're > "cool". Does your definition of "easier" include writing less Java code? and less stuff in configuration files? If so, please compare the mailreader code in Struts 1.x versus the Shale-ized version. You'll find substantial improvements. If those aspects are not included in your definition, I'd be curious what is. > > Writing Java webapps should be easy. > I'd say "as easy as possible, but no easier" :-) > David Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
