On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:08:34 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, Paul, your own last response was about the framework and about > Java. I sure am getting quizzical about these interjections. >
Martin is right ... this thread has gone outside the bounds of off-topicness for Struts lists. I apologize for my contribution to the noise level. > I cannot raise these questions simply in relation to WeakReference, > etc. They are an ongoing issue about one look at the Struts framework > which I have called HaD. The problem is that this is just *your* viewpoint, and its not even fleshed out enough yet to be a proposal that any of the committers (including me) have expressed interest in as a potential Struts architecture; it has strayed into being a Java Virtual Machine 101 discussion. > If that is not tangentially okay on this > list, then I think some people are just wound way too tight and I am > in total disagreement with this approach. Some common sense would be > advised, in my opinion. > Some respect for the feelings of the company you are trying to keep would be advised, in my opinion :-). Craig (last message on this thread) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
