ActionContext could certainly, and probably will be, a subclass of
o.a.c.c.Context but my point is it will not be a subclass of the
ServletWebContext, which struts-chain creates and passes through its
commands.
Don
Vic wrote:
Ah... can someone educate me as to why not just subclass chain
context, would it not let you just do the same thing you said bellow?
(and w/o servlet api).
.V
Don Brown wrote:
The summary of our discussion, as I understand it, would be to create
a ActionContext, which would not be a subclass of any commons-chain
contexts, but would contain the commons-chain, probably WebContext
instance available via a getter. This would allow us to have one
ActionContext instance, and not have to subclass the different faces,
portlet, and servlet instances. The Action class would be replaced
by an Actionable (name not decided) interface which would have one
method, execute(ActionContext ctx). This ActionContext would also
have basically all the methods from Action like saveToken(), etc.
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
