On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:50:51 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip] > Probably a little bit off topic, but I wanted to respond to your > theory. If your theory is correct, then yes, JSF is a dead-end. I > don't agree with that theory, but I'm not sure that JSF will be the > next step either. That will depend on how fast developers evaluate > and then adopt the technology. And that will depend on how fast JSF > evolves to address various issues (see an earlier post of mine about > current JSF limitations.) Assuming that JSF and "highly dynamic" apps (i.. where a high degree of interactivity happens on the client side via DHTML and JavaScript) are mutually exclusive is too simplistic. The standard components in 1.0/1.1 don't help you do this sort of thing, but there are already JSF component libraries available that do. Such libraries use the JSF components to persist the page author's design decisions (i.e. set the correct attributes on the correct tags or whatever), rather than do the actual rendering -- so they still fit nicely into development tools that know how to manipulate components. > > sean > Craig > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
