<snip/>
' ' ' [-] test ' ' (really need to get this back in order ' ' or figure out a new strategy..more on ' ' this later)
Is this all taglibs tests right now? If so, perhaps it should live under 'taglibs' instead of 'apps', since it isn't a "real" application. If not, um, I dunno. This seems an odd place for tests.
Yes, good point, I agree
You missed one. We also have 'struts-examples' directly under 'core/trunk', which has 'mailreader' in it. Just to complicate things, this also has a different source structure.
Yes, I've done some diffs on the various mailreader apps that seem to litter the landscape ;)
I'd like to get them all consolidated (at least as much as can be done) providing a single mailreader.jar for the variations.
We need to come up with one standard structure - we seem to have quite a few at the moment. The sources go in different places, the config files go in different places, etc. Not easy to follow at all.
Yes, that's exactly what I intend to clean up. Please don't hesitate if something looks odd, or if you prefer a diffent name. Not sure how many people caught my rename for 'examples' :D
- merge the mailreader sample app (and tests) from commons-chain to struts "apps" (as indicated above)
Need to check the relationship between this mailreader and the one under struts-examples.
will do.
I would like all the apps/trunk/foo to be mavenized, and each project.xml creates a single .war file suitable for deployment. Each project would/should inherit from a parent project.xml under apps/trunk that can build the entire set of apps. So you can build any app you like, or just build them all. The build.xml file will be generated by maven (hopefully the path issues will be resolved).
Do you plan to do Maven builds for the other subprojects as well, or just for the 'apps' subproject? Should I take the Ant build system off my to-do list?
I hope you don't feel that I'm ripping the rug from under your feet. That is
certainly not my intent. I was just hoping to get a consistent structure
and build for the "apps" for now. The repository seem to be in shambles at
the moment.
As complicated as the build xml files (all 3 of them) seem to be to some people, I know them pretty well, and it just makes my head hurt looking at where we are now and what needs to happen to get a clean "ant dist" and "ant release".
I figured I would take my chances on the "apps" and generate the ant stuff. Instead of the other way around (back into a project.xml by hand)
Well, I'll wait to hear more on this before I actually pull out the axe and 10 lb sledge ;)
-- Martin Cooper
-- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
