> I'm convinced that XML is a lousy way to specify things like this.
You might be right... People do try and cram way too much into XML IMHO, but I'm not completely convinced yet. I think I'd like to see a failed implementation of the idea before passing judgement. I share your concern to a lesser degree though for certain. :)
Some people consider Jelly a good example of a failed implementation, although Maven continues to use it. (I believe a lot of their dissatisfaction with it is driving Marmalade for Maven 2, although I don't remember all the details.) If you go looking on the net, you'll find diatribes against Jelly.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
