What about an idea that's not part of the current discussion, like FormDef? I would love for Struts to have something like what FormDef offers. I wouldn't mind working on something that incorporates FormDef's features to the Struts core, or even just contribute FormDef to Struts directly.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:38:07 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think so. An idea with a working, and ideally deployed, > implementation is much more interesting than some guy/gal's opinion. > Apache works on the principle of a meritocracy where those that do the > most work get the most privilege. "Patches speak louder than words" :) > > If you want to tackle one of the major bullets on the roadmap, I'd > suggest you write up a short proposal of your idea and what it will > entail. If you get a favorable response, code it up and stick it on a > server somewhere with a nice demo and explanation. It takes more time > to publish the code properly by writing up a small website with an > explanation and hopefully demo, but it makes it much more likely folks > will bother to give it a look. Throwing code over the wall is not > attractive as most committers and developers in general don't have that > kind of free time. > > Bottom line: get involved. Check out the code, fix minor bugs, write a > small extension, improve on someone else's idea, but just get involved. > > Don > > > Hubert Rabago wrote: > > Would this mean if I had an idea I'd like to offer up, I'd implement > > it, create the sample app, then present everything to the dev list? > > What about those looking to contribute to the path the committers have > > chosen? > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:18:10 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Of course, you and anyone else, are welcome to attack bugs in bugzilla > >>to speed us along to another release. What I personally would be > >>interested in is for you to explore your "vision" of how action > >>invocation should work, then rewrite a small app like the mail reader to > >>use it. I don't believe commons-chain belongs in the action tier so I'd > >>be interested in being proven wrong. :) > >> > >>Don > >> > >>Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > >> > >>>Since I've been involved in these discussions today, I wanted to "put my > >>>money where my (rather substantially large) mouth is" and offer up > >>>myself to do some actual work. > >>> > >>>If there's anything you guys can pawn off on me, I wouldn't mind being > >>>involved in some small way. I don't think I could sign up for any major > >>>pieces at the moment, but if you have some things you might be able to > >>>offload to me, you'll have my best effort :) > >>> > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
