On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:12:49 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: > I am +1 on putting common build-related stuff in a common place, > but I am -1 on combining / confusing the notions of 'build' and > 'site'. IMO, we want: > > current/build: Shared build configuration, as you are describing. > current/site: All of the stuff for the root Struts web site, to > which subproject sites will "plug in" (when deployed).
Is there an advantage to having both /build and /site? Is there a reason why /site cannot play both roles? The general use case would be that /site is the "integration" module, both in terms of subproject builds and subproject documentation/websites. -T. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
