On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:49:52 +0100, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this sound stupid, I cant find the url that svn requires to
> checkout shale et al.

http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html#SourceCode

--
Martin Cooper


> I saw that someone mentioned flowscript unit
> testing, I'm working on a cocoon project and I'd like to see if
> there's a way of testing the flowscripts we have.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:28:04 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Cooper wrote:
> > <snip />
> > > OK, I've created a build subproject, with trunk / tags / branches,
> > > added it to 'current', and also added it to the following subprojects:
> > > apps, bsf, core, el, faces, taglib, tiles. I have *not* added it to:
> > > flow, sandbox, shale. Certainly shale uses a separate build system,
> > > but should I go ahead and add it to flow and sandbox?
> >
> > Sure, flow's build was copied right from bsf.  Flow does have a custom
> > run-tests Ant task which uses a homegrown Javascript unit testing
> > framework.  It also has two other tasks for building the two example
> > applications.  I believe Maven can use Ant tasks, but I have no idea how.
> >
> > Thanks for the hard work.
> >
> > Don
> >
> > >
> > > I added a little README file that tries to explain what the deal is
> > > with this showing up in multiple places. With any luck, some people
> > > will actually read it. ;-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>--
> > >>James Mitchell
> > >>Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> > >>EdgeTech, Inc.
> > >>678.910.8017
> > >>AIM: jmitchtx
> > >>
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
> > >>Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 3:13 AM
> > >>Subject: Re: Building Struts
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:04:34 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>That seems like quite a hack
> > >>>
> > >>>I'd be interested to hear why you feel this way. It's actually pretty
> > >>>much the exact scenario for which svn:externals were created, and, I
> > >>>think, somewhat more in line with the expected usage of that
> > >>>functionality that the whole 'current' thing is. ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>>--
> > >>>Martin Cooper
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>and going to be a bit awkward to the
> > >>>>unsuspecting user/developer.  But I honestly don't have a better option
> > >>>>right now.  I've already started the process of consolidating the 
> > >>>>various
> > >>>>common maven configuration stuff.  I'll be checking things in this
> > >>>>weekend
> > >>>>and next week.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>--
> > >>>>James Mitchell
> > >>>>Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
> > >>>>EdgeTech, Inc.
> > >>>>678.910.8017
> > >>>>AIM: jmitchtx
> > >>>>
> > >>>>----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
> > >>>>Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:03 PM
> > >>>>Subject: Re: Building Struts
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:25:02 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>I am not really familiar with svn:externals, but it sounds great.  I'm
> > >>>>>>not
> > >>>>>>100% sure that (2) is true, at least, if we're going to use maven dist
> > >>>>>>to
> > >>>>>>build distros.  But even if we have to do a little, it will be much
> > >>>>>>more
> > >>>>>>straightforward.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Yes, you're right. We will need to tell Maven to include the build
> > >>>>>directory. But that should be pretty straightforward.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>If everyone's OK with this, I'll have a go at it tomorrow, if nobody
> > >>>>>beats me to it. (I'll be out all day today, starting about 5 minutes
> > >>>>>from now ;).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>--
> > >>>>>Martin Cooper
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>(for those who are interested:
> > >>>>>>Chapter 7. Advanced Topics: Externals Definitions
> > >>>>>>http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch07s03.html
> > >>>>>>)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>I'm +1 on this approach.  From the tail end of the page from the SVN
> > >>>>>>book,
> > >>>>>>it looks like we'll have to be conscious of some issues if we do any
> > >>>>>>future
> > >>>>>>repository re-orgs, but hopefully we won't have to.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>Joe
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>At 7:43 AM -0800 2/19/05, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > >>>>>>By using svn:externals, we gain several things:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1) We get a "free" copy of 'build' along with each subproject,
> > >>>>>>meaning
> > >>>>>> that it doesn't have to be checked out separately to build one
> > >>>>>> subproject. Checking out 'core', for example, would be enough to
> > >>>>>>build
> > >>>>>> core.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2) The "free" copy means that we don't have to do anything special
> > >>>>>> when building the source distros, since the 'build' directory will
> > >>>>>> already be part of the checked out subproject when the distro is
> > >>>>>>being
> > >>>>>> created.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 3) We don't have to mess with Maven properties to deal with two
> > >>>>>> different build scenarios (i.e. checked out vs. source distro).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 4) It's really simple! :-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>Joe Germuska
> > >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>> http://blog.germuska.com
> > >>>>>> "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction"  -The Ex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to