<SNIP> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:55:39 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as that is the case, the only > argument for a 2.x version number that makes any sense would be > marketing related (get some attention with a major new version number > to hide the fact that it's pretty much the same as before when you > look at it from the outside). > > Craig </SNIP>
Ah, yes! That open source market niche being saved for JSF! ///;-) -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
