David, Definitely keep us posted on your progress on this. I am sure that there would be no shortage of volunteers to help you with testing and debugging.
sean On Apr 1, 2005 9:15 AM, Snow Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi David, > >I hope to have some time to work on this in the not-too-distant future. > >I've seen a lot of interest in standalone Tiles, both here and in the > >real world. > > > >In the meantime, I would just use Tiles that comes with Struts 1.1 > >instead of implementing a Tiles servlet. I don't believe that Tiles has > >changed much since 1.1. > That is great that you are willing to make the time for this effort. We > are looking to support whichever version of Struts that would be in line > with our schedule, so it could be 1.2.4, 1.2.6 or even 1.3. Because we > have customers who would use Tiles without Struts and also Tiles with > Struts, we don't want to deal with including different versions of code > depending on whichever case it is. For now, we have decided to just use > Struts ActionServlet for both cases instead of writing our own servlet. > The Tiles user does not have to do anything with Struts and just has a > bare-bone struts-config file, which should not be too bothersome. This > will keep things simple until Tiles is separated out. > Thank you for your response. > > Snow Huynh > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
