----- Original Message ----- From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:03 PM
> That's cool. No worries (see above). El will be part of the nightlies > tonight. Thanks for pointing this out. Excellent, thanks again :-) > > The only other thing I noticed was the binary distro unpacks to the > > "struts-1.2.6" folder. In the past nightlies just unpacked to a "struts" > > (or > > jakarta-struts) folder - I don't have a problem with including a version > > number, but I think 1.2.6 is mis-leading - IMO "struts-1.2.7-nightly" or > > "struts-nightly" or "struts-20050402" would be better. > > That's correct. The way I am building the nightlies is by running Ant using > the "release" target. So any one of us can change that to whatever we feel > is the best name. (I need to tweak my nightly script to either ignore the > x.y.z part of the name or move the copying to be part of the ant build since > I can just build the 'copy from' name the same env. > > If you want to make that change, go ahead, I'll see it come across and I'll > patch my nightly accordingly. Currently its constructed from the "project.version" property in the build.xml and AFAIK in the past thats only been updated when we actually release a version. Whatever we do with that though, IMO the best thing for the nightly builds is to override the "upload.file.base" property in the build.properties file and set it to "struts-1.2.7-nightly". What do you think? I've just noticed something else - the source distro's don't contain the el taglib source either - and actually the recent 1.2.6 version we distributed recently didn't. Its because of the SVN migration and moving things like el out of the head/trunk and into its own separate component. I'll add something to the 1.2.x build.xml to copy the el source in. Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
