On 4/12/05, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over a year ago Niall submitted a patch (which was not accepted) that
> would allow validation using format strings used by the Java Format
> classes (such as ###,##0.00).  If there's going to be an overhaul of
> validation, I would like support for these to be reconsidered.  If we
> ever go to having an integrated form bean configuration file that
> would cover field declaration, formatting/parsing, and validation,
> these format strings would avoid requiring the user to specify
> different format strings for the same field, like in salary property
> in the example on
> http://www.rabago.net/struts/formdef/manual.htm#combinedformelement
> 
> Or am I looking too far ahead?

I've always thought that input validation and data conversion are
cohesive tasks. Right now, many of the validations convert the data
and then throw it away, just so we can convert it again later (this
time with feeling!).

David W and I tinkered with the idea of keeping the converted data and
passing it back, but we didn't have a good place to put it. Now that
we are moving to a context-based environment, that might be changing.

In my own work, I use two contexts. One is a "sandbox" area where
incoming data is validated, converted, and formatted. As it is
converted, it moves from the sandbox context to the domain context. On
the flip-side, the opposite happens, items are converted/formatted
from the domain context to the sandbox context. The View works with
the sandbox context (or "FieldState"), the internal commands work with
the domain context.

Another package that binds validation, conversion, and formatting is
FormProc at SourceForge. It uses a similar model where input from an
input map is validated and converted to an output map. It's not
bidirectional though, and I think being able to roundtrip input is
key.

And +1 for doing the combined form element in 1.4. 

Eventually, I'd like to see us take this even farther, so that keys
for field labels and hints can also be specified. The goal being to
enable us to create a simple utility form from a single JSP tag, using
the detail supplied via the XML configuration.

-Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to