On the Roadmap for Struts Core, there's an entry where we consider refactoring for Spring. Such a refactoring would be an excellent opporunity to address issues like this. I'd suggest we mark this ticket to handle during that iteration, and cross-reference the Roadmap.
Heck, if we switch to a wrapper around the Spring XML loader, than a lot of this would be resolved. And, of course, we did address this ticket to some extent with the config verifier. -Ted. On 4/21/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It may be a valid issue, but so is "Make Struts Faster". My point is > this ticket is so broad its long life is a testament to its validity or > lack thereof. I suppose it gets down to how each developer views > tickets, but I personally see enhancements tickets as requesting a > specific feature that can measurably be addressed. If this ticket was > broken up into its specific examples, they'd be fine tickets I'd even > recommend be marked bugs. > > I don't feel strongly enough to make a big deal of this, but it is > another symptom of a general "paralysis" I feel affects Struts > development. Sure, we need to be careful for backwards compatibility > and we want to encourage participation, but there is also value in > having a strong direction and making tough decisions to move the project > forward. Three year old bugs so general they remain unaddressed, I > feel, need to either be fixed or resolved in another manner. If we > can't come to grips with our past, how can we lead in the future? > > </sermon> :) > > Don > > Ted Husted wrote: > > You might open a wiki page where we could start collecting more > > information, and perhaps develop a strategy. > > > > IMHO, this is a valid issue. But, it's also an enhancement, and won't > > block a release. Marking it invalid doesn't seem appropriate. > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 4/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > >>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > >><http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739>. > >>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· > >>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > >> > >>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739 > >> > >>------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-21 16:55 ------- > >>My concern with this bug is that it started out with a broad scope, and in > >>the > >>course of its life, became even more so. I wouldn't be opposed to reopening > >>the more specific ones, and either marking this as invalid or renaming it to > >>limit its scope to checking struts-config declarations. > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > >>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > >>You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
