Regarding a JEXL-based validator to plug in to Struts' commons-validator bridge:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34849
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-10 21:11 ------- I put out two other similar patches which used jxpath and beanshell respectively. It was suggested validator should have an "extras" section, and if created, perhaps that would be a good place for this as well.
I'd be ok with putting these in some package other than struts-core, although I don't think we have anything really obvious right now. Then again, I've been wanting to get a JEXL dependency into Struts to suit my vision of auto-loading per-action (and per-forward) commands -- but those could go in this other kit as well. We could probably factor out most everything under o.a.struts.actions as well -- is it right to push it all into its own soup? What would we call it?
Is it worth having a validator-only extras package? Or just lob 'em all in one? If Validator itself were factored out of the core, would people still feel strongly that these things wouldn't belong in a validator JAR artifact?
Joe
--
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
