DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35008 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 02:18 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > But with the XML solution you have all definitions at one place and it would > even be possible to generate documentation from it. > Don't misunderstand me. I'm not absolutely against your solution and it > could be a very powerful solution in complicated cases. > What about something like this? I see what you mean now. I prefer declarative over programmatic also. There would not be any assumptions. We could keep the attributes collection reserved for true attributes. This would require a few changes as we would be removing some logic making it more generic but adding support for the properties. This would be a pretty sizable refactoring. I think the attached patch could be applied as a base for starting this work as it contains the inheritance fix. I would like to hear Craig's and David's feedback first....... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
