netsql wrote: >3. And to make it C# possible... all user exposed classes should be an >interface (so that same interface could be reimplemented).
I don't get this. maybe I missed something here, (entirely possible) but how are you going to write an underlying implementation in C# that can be called by Java? Or vice versa? I totally agree that all the API should be interfaces, but I'm not sure that the reason should be that you can reimplement it in C#. Please explain. Thanks, Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
