On 8/8/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List both of them?  I can see where someone would want to push 36037 back
> to 1.3.1, but I would think the CheckStyle changes should get done sooner
> rather than later, if they are going to happen at all.  Opinions?

For #35956, you might try posting the proposal directly to dev@, where
it will get more attention. The changes are more of a matter of policy
than of code, and the roundup would be best vetted on the list.

If you are keen on making these changes for the CheckStyle report, I'd
suggest running a report against the changed configuration, and
posting a copy of the result

-Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to