If no one has any suggestions as to why any tag attributes should be marked RE false, I'll make this change (and the others) before running through the shake-down tests on Monday. (If we have the website and deprecations squared away by then.)
My many thanks to everyone who is making the 1.3.x release series possible. I love it when a plan comes together ... especially plans we made eighteen months ago :) (Yes, it's been that long. We've been planning to divy Struts up into subprojects and fully support Maven since we went top-level, in March 2004. Our earliest Maven test builds go back another year, to March 2003. Ahh, well, slow and steady ... ) -Ted. On 8/9/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a reason why these tag attributes are marked RE false? > > I strongly suspect there was, but not knowing what it was, I can't say > whether or not it's still valid. My first guess would be because of > rules about exposing new variables from tags, but perhaps Craig or > David K could chime in on this one. > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > bean > > * cookie.id > > * define.id > > * header.id > > * anchor.id > > * page.id > > * parameter.id > > * resource.id > > * size.id > > * struts.id > > > > html > > * javascript.dynamicJavascript > > * javascript.staticJavascript > > * messages.id > > > > logic > > * collection.id > > * iterate.indexId > > > > ---- > > > > * Remove deprecations prior to 1.3.0 release > > * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35953 > > > > Hubert, will you still be able to handle this? (Pretty please ..) > > > > --- > > > > -Ted. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- HTH, Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
