At 7:34 AM -0400 8/29/05, Ted Husted wrote:
Hmmm, I think this is the part where we say, "Thanks for volunteering, Don."
:)
If you'd like to see the JEXL patch in version 1.3.0, then, please, have at
it :)
Well, there's a fair amount of hemming and hawing in the comment
history for that ticket in Bugzilla. There were concerns about
dependencies and such, and I was basically just waiting for more
consensus before committing it.
I've got people on my team using it by copy in a few places and
people are pretty satisfied with it, although it did flush out that
html:javascript bug -- and in addition to what was reported in
Bugzilla, there are also problems if you use line-breaks in your JEXL
expression -- those also need to be escaped, but I don't think it was
mentioned in the ticket.
But anyway, in general, it is pretty neat. If folks think that all
the questions which were raised in Bugzilla are either settled or
unimportant, I should be able to commit it today or tomorrow.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
