Sorry for the delay on this thread... just catching up now. Currently
the minimum in the non-Java5 code is 1.4, although we never discussed
it. I think supporting 1.3 would be really hard, but it's something we
should establish.
Currently, the 'samples' .war is Java5 (annotation)-based, but I was
planning on posting a 1.4 (tag)-based version as soon as I could get
that compilation layer in there. Thought it could/should just go into a
parallel samples .war. How does that sound.
Rich
James Mitchell wrote:
I'm documenting the build process and I thought I'd take a stab at
figuring out how to have our build conditionally ignore anything that
requires 1.5 if they are using 1.4 or less.
What is the minimum? I've just been assuming 1.4.
Everything (.WARs) in Ti require 1.5. Is that supposed to be the case?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 2, 2005, at 10:55 AM, James Mitchell wrote:
That's what I'd like to make sure we understand and document. I'll
have some time later today, so I'll put together a proposal for said
'build documentation', which will likely be the beginnings of the
Maven docs. Probably ought to keep on the wiki for now though.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 2, 2005, at 1:19 AM, Rich Feit wrote:
Sounds good from my point of view. :)
As to a structure for the distribution, would it simply be
something like:
docs
lib
samples
java5
java1.4
tools
README, etc.
?
Rich
James Mitchell wrote:
My plan would be to publish the nightlies here:
http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-
sandbox/
...under a new directory 'ti'
Does that sound ok?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Rich Feit wrote:
First, I just want to mention that I've never been involved in a
project where anyone's given so much thought/attention to the
build from the ground up. Thank you -- it's a pleasure! Much
nicer than rewriting the build a few months down the road.
I definitely support getting nightlies out there ASAP, for
people to play with. Is it legitimate to publish a directory
'sandbox/ti/ nightly' under struts.apache.org, or is that really
off-limits while this project is in the sandbox?
Rich
James Mitchell wrote:
I think it would be a good idea for us to discuss and decide on
the layout and build processes. The build process needs to be
documented end to end. We should identify the artifacts
created, when and why it is created. More than the simple
comments that I put in maven.xml. I will volunteer to do all
of this work.
As far as using Maven, I really like what we have so far. It
is clean and efficient, but more work needs to be done.
Keeping the build and layout organized is a team effort. And
I'm willing to do all the work to keep it up to date.
We were asked a few days ago, and I was hoping to do it, but
time got away from me. When can we talk about putting
nightlies together for people to try out?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Rich Feit wrote:
Hi all,
I've added a patch (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
show_bug.cgi? id=36454) for a sample that demonstrates using
JSF as the view layer for a Ti app. It's a straight port of
the Beehive/JSF sample. It doesn't necessarily show off JSF
(or JSF best practices), but it does demonstrate the
integration (e.g., JSF pages raising actions in Ti).
Our samples do beg the question(s):
- Should we be building a 'normal' webapp for each one,
including an ant script that will build the app? Something to
put into our distribution.
- Should we use maven to build the samples .wars only for
internal testing and perhaps for publishing the samples to a
live site?
I think we shouldn't require our users to have maven in order
to build *projects* (not our source tree). Is that
reasonable, or am I living in the past?
James - let me know if this blows up your maven structure in
any way. It seems to work, but I'm not trying to do anything
from the top level.
Thanks,
Rich
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
