DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36643>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36643 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-17 21:48 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I see what you me. From a similar front, we have tried very hard with our > html parser to not impose a standard on the templates. > > I had thought this would be a good feature for developers that wanted to > travel lite and fast without the need of an XML configuration file. There's > allot of fuss now about verbose configuration files. Gary, I see your point of view too, and it may be a nice feature. But currently the problem is that the developer can not decide which version he wants to use. To solve the problem, we only need an option to tell that an attribute is a value binding expression or not. Possibly something like this: <attributes> <set name="value" valueBinding="false" /> </attributes> In close future, I have finished a first version of a tighter integration between my proposed parser and the builders. >From there it is only a very very small step to make the builders pluggable. Then the support of both variants is possible and the development team can decide which they use. They must only use the corresponding builder. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
