On 10/10/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rahul, > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/scxml-in-shale/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erahul/scxml-in-shale/>*time-sensitive > > URL* > > One other note before I hit the sack tonight ... with regards to your "either/or" question, you could actually have *both* SCXML-based and Shale-dialog-based support at the same time pretty easily. All it takes is:
* Use a prefix on logical outcome strings different from "dialog:xxx" to invoke the special SCXML processing. Maybe "scxml:xxx"? * Make sure your NavigationHandler implementation delegates when it's not inside an SCXML based flow (probably already does, didn't check the code). * Add a META-INF/faces-config.xml in your JAR file that defines just the SCXML navigation handler implementation. That would make the option of gradually transitioning to SCXML based dialogs much easier, and would avoid a bunch of the work you describe to modify the standard Shale environment. Craig
