On Mon, October 31, 2005 2:08 am, Thor Kristensen said: > I realize that this should be an automized task (always keeping diagrams > up-to-date), but it would be perfect if the diagrams were rendered, in the > browser, as "clickable" links, thus clicking on the package-only diagram, > would link to the diagram of that specific package.
That's actually a really good idea, but I'm not sure, can you have image maps in javadocs? I can't remember the last time I did an image map, I'm not even sure I remember how they work :) I'm trying to figure out the best way to do this that will be easily reproducible in the future and meet the criteria we're discussing... doing it at the package level (with the package relation diagram you mentioned, good suggestino!), small file size (I'm thinking 50k max, trying for about half that) and in a vertical orientation (i.e., max width of about 700-800 pixels). I'm OK with PNG too by the way. I don't mind doing two versions, a more "plain" one and one with more details, but frankly if I can get all the details in and still meet the other goals, that's less work and so that would be my first goal. In the end though, I'm *NOT* signing up to do this by hand :) If I can coerce one of the tools I have to spit something out automatically that doesn't require more than a few minutes of touch-up afterwards, then life is good. If I can't, then someone else can volunteer. :) Heh, I wonder if there's a Maven plug-in for this yet it? Seems like something that would fit in with its toolset rather well. > > Regards > Thor Frank > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:19 PM >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Re: Struts class diagram >> >> From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > http://www.omnytex.com/actionpackage.zip >> > >> > That's considerably smaller (128K and more usable size)... also in >> > full color (couldn't do it before because of the size). >> Also, I can >> > move the classes around, which I didn't realize before, so I can >> > organize it a bit better. >> >> I think we have different goals here. :) I'm looking for >> ~25k image files for the package summary docs on the website. >> Black and white is fine, and they don't need to show the >> attributes and methods, just the class names. >> >> Leaving the package docs aside, I hesitate to put large >> images directly on web pages since not everyone has >> broadband. But we could do a page of thumbnails and >> descriptions, so that people could choose to load the large >> image. Or offer a .zip file as a download. Thoughts? >> >> -- >> Wendy >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
