On 11/7/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if there is a way to generate the documentation
> > without the pre blocks, or more generally with span blocks and a
> > stylesheet of choice? To better illustrate my point, a before and
> > after sample of the TLD docs overview page is here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/struts/taglib-doc.html
>
> I'm not sure.  The <pre> blocks are not in the TLDs, so they must be
> coming from taglibrarydoc (https://taglibrarydoc.dev.java.net/) which
> is used by the plugin.  The documentation there does mention
> customizing the output, but the process involves modifying the .jar.
>
<snip/>

Indeed, for example, for the overview-summary.html that I posted the
before/after for, scroll to the bottom of the following stylesheet
(long URL below, might be fragmented), you'll find the <pre> block:

https://taglibrarydoc.dev.java.net/source/browse/taglibrarydoc/taglibrarydoc/src/share/com/sun/tlddoc/resources/overview-summary.html.xsl

This isn't ASL code, thats a dead end AFAIAC.


> > Another issue I noticed is that the taglib:tagreference goal seems to
> > produce inconsistent internal anchors on the tagreference pages?
> > Internal anchors are defined as "taglib-short-name:tag-name" and
> > linked to as "#tag-name" so none of the internal anchors work.
>
> That seems to have been introduced in the 1.4.1 version of the Taglib
> plugin.  The links work fine if you generate the site with version
> 1.4, (but then you get &lt;base&gt; instead of <base> in the summary.)
>
> > I guess this is all probably best clarified in maven taglib plug-in
> > land, but appears they don't have mailing lists.
>
> I sent Fabrizio a note about the broken links.  I'm sure he would
> appreciate a patch to the m1 version of the taglib plugin if you're so
> inclined. :)
<snap/>

Must you insist? ;-) On [
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/maven-taglib/maven-taglib-plugin/src/plugin-resources/taglibdoc.xsl?view=markup
] the discrepancy seems to be between line 84 (no short-name prefix)
and lines 126-132 (short-name prefix). And ofcourse, this has a third
license.

I'll send him a note on his sf.net email. Hopefully, that should fix this one.


> Meanwhile, please open a bug against the Struts site so
> we don't forget to follow up on this.
>
<snip/>

OK, in a bit.

-Rahul



> Thanks!
> --
> Wendy
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to