> ----Original Message---- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Nov 13, 2005 5:58:15 AM > To: dev@struts.apache.org > Subj: DynaActionForm enhancement > > I've just committed my proposed enhancement for DynaActionForm, > described in #36794 [1], together with documentation updates to reflect > the changes. I'd like to extend this to include Ryan Stewart's > enhancement for allowing dyna forms to dynamically implement a > configurable interface, as described in #37301 [2], but with a slight > useability improvement: I'd like to allow the interface to be specified > with an 'interface' attribute rather than via set-property, as in > > <form-bean name="..." type="...Dyna..." inferface="...Foo"> > > Obviously that'd require a DTD change. I believe the consensus is that > this isn't a problem, but I wanted to check before I go ahead. > > Ryan presented a good use case to justify the enhancement in #37301, but > to further sweeten the deal, consider that this could potentially allow > you to access properties on dyan forms with regular getFoo / setFoo > methods simply by writing (or generating) an interface ;-) > > L. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36794 > [2] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37301 >
Greetings again. Sorry I haven't commented on this before. Been pretty busy, and I'll be gone next week, too. Are you planning to add the "interface" attribute still? I don't see it anywhere right now. That was actually the route I was planning to propose. The code I wrote was just what was necessary to be as unintrusive as possible and easily plugged in to an existing Struts 1.2.7 or earlier project. I thought I had a couple other suggestions on your code, but in reading through it, they've gone away. So have you had any further thoughts on how my changes might be integrated with yours? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
