On 11/25/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Author: craigmcc > > Date: Fri Nov 25 16:32:57 2005 > > New Revision: 349048 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349048&view=rev > > Log: > > Tag the Struts Shale 1.0.0-RC1 release candidate for posterity. > > > Are you using a different versioning scheme for Shale? For the rest of > Struts, we've abandoned RCs in favour of Test Builds, so if Shale used the > same scheme, it would just be 1.0.0. Just wondering...
It's still going to be a test build, but (especially the first time around) I want to make sure people have a chance to help me get the packaging right. I've seen several commons packages do RCs even though they are following the same versioning guidelines we are, for the same reason. -- > Martin Cooper Craig Added: > > struts/shale/tags/STRUTS-SHALE_1.0.0-RC1/ > > - copied from r349044, struts/shale/trunk/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
