JIRA is already on Apache servers.

Outstanding!

+1



--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
678.910.8017

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Target tickets to milestones and use as roadmap


JIRA is already on Apache servers.

But back to the topic, what do folks think of the proposal to target tickets to milestones and use them for release planning? I think we should start immediately by creating upcoming milestones, and going through all our old tickets and assigning them to the new milestones. This would go a long way to folks wondering what exactly was in 1.3.0.

Don

James Mitchell wrote:
I know we've had the Jira vs. Bugzilla discussion before, but given the size and momentum of our product(s)/community, I think the driving reasons for staying on Bugzilla are not as valid as they once were.

I've had the fortune of using both on paying gigs and while Jira definitely has perks over bugzilla wrt user/project management and administration, I agree with Don that it should exist on Apache hardware. I'm not sure if things have changed, but I believe infrastructure won't do this for any project, but then, we could always do like the Geronimo folks do ;)


--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
678.910.8017

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Target tickets to milestones and use as roadmap


Sure, moving to JIRA would also be fine. The thrust of this proposal is that we start using Milestones and targetting tickets towards them. The roadmap tool we use is a minor point. Even if we switched with JIRA, we'd still have to change how we use the ticketing system.

As for switching, I think we should either switch all or none. Personally, I find it confusing when for a single project, some materials are on one one site, and others on another. This applies to the wiki thread as well. If we want to move to Confluence, then let's get it installed on our Apache servers and move our all the wiki pages to it. Especially as Struts expands, it is important we keep a tight discipline of consistency for how we manage the projects.

Don

Ted Husted wrote:

Or, we could JIRA for the new projects, which supports Roadmaps directly.

* http://tinyurl.com/8m4d6

-Ted.

On 11/30/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I propose we use an automated, easy to understand roadmap that relies on
Bugzilla tickets marked against Milestones.

With all the action in the Struts project lately, it is hard to see what is going on where, and specifically, qualitatively how much work remains before a Milestone will be reached. We need a system that makes it easy to see at a glance the roadmap of each Struts subproject, and guide new
contributions.

I see the solution involving the following:
 1. All tickets, bugs and enhancements, should be marked against a
Milestone if accepted
 2. Any major feature or bug fix committed to svn should have a ticket
and be assigned to a milestone.
 3. A ticket should only be marked against a Milestone if a developer
has committed to work on it
 4. Once all the all the tickets against a Milestone have been
resolved, the release is ready to be rolled.

The public face of this solution will be automated roadmap pages, which
will be generated from Bugzilla reports.  These pages will show, at a
glance, the status of each subproject, its milestones, and current
progress toward reaching them.

I've developed a Java console app, driven by a cron, which screen
scrapes Bugzilla reports to generate a roadmap [1]. As you can see from the demo, we don't currently use milestones much at all. The roadmap is
an idea taken from Trac [2] and I've personally have had great success
with this approach of organizing Milestones.

Comments?

Don

[1] http://www.twdata.org/dakine/roadmap/action.html
[2] http://www.edgewall.com/trac/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to