DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38168>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38168 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-08 23:26 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > It's also friendly to be > > > "gratuitously compatible" with other popular frameworks :-). > > You know me... I just want everything to match. :) > > Can the "given a delimited list of paths, return a list of (?) URLs" code be > > moved somewhere it can be used by validation, dialogs, Clay, etc.? > > I believe that they all have dependencies with core shale. Maybe the > core "util" package would be a good place for this common code. > If there are only one or two classes, that makes sense ... if there's more, then we'll probably want a specialize subpackage for configuration resource support ... maybe "org.apache.shale.util.config" or something. We'll also want to ensure that the reload-if-the-config-is-changed capability is carried over into this. WebWork has some generalized code for this sort of thing that we should look at, too. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
