On 1/18/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, that is the standard open source way. It usually works great. > > I'm just confused. I thought that everything had to be blessed, endorsed, > and signed off by the gods/lawyers/infrastructure folks of Apache. If most > of the people working on Struts Action prefer Confluence and JIRA, is there > anything stopping us from asking Contegix to set them up?
I may be mistaken, but AFAIK, Ted is the only person advocating the use of Confluence. (Well, until you got here, that is. ;) He's certainly the one who keeps bringing it up. The rest of us are happy enough to stick to the wiki that the ASF has set up and supports. As for JIRA, there are a few who object on the basis that it's not open source, while others would be happy to move to it. Personally, I'd be happy to move to the ASF JIRA instance, but I'm not in favour of moving to a bug tracking installation that's outside the ASF. -- Martin Cooper How about taking that further? What is stopping me from making a new forum > (and mailing list) just for Action 2.0? Obviously I wouldn't do that, but > since I'm new here I'd rather bring things up with the team than quickly > fork off in to my own little world and, as you pointed out, potentially be > missing important information. > > Patrick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Posted via Jive Forums > > http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=14842&messageID=29170#29170 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
