Rick Reumann agreed:
> 
> On 1/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>  > So, all they need to do is remove the positive branch 
> there, move is to
> > wasCancelled(), and remove the rest of the if block.
> >
> > Anyone else see that as a reasonable solution?  Is there a 
> flaw in it 
> > I'm missing?
> 
> Ha, I was typing that up as my prefered solution as well. You 
> obviously posted this while I was typing:) I agree, though, 
> that to me having a "wasCanceled" (or in my email I just 
> called it "canceled") method is the most clean.

+1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to