DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35703>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35703 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-26 19:05 ------- I still don't think you've addressed Niall's concern about breaking the contract of the RequestProcessor, especially with regards to code in doInclude() that relies on something that happens earlier in the RequestProcessor chain of events. The RequestProcessor is meant to be executed as a whole. The hooks are plugin points for applications to override specific steps in the process. IMO, it's not a good idea to start using that API in other parts of the framework. To me part 1 of your patch is a workaround to expose part of the API that was not meant to be exposed. I would personally be very hestant to stretch the 1.2.x API in this manner. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
