On 2/6/06, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason they do that is they want to be absolutely safe, which I > understand. But since it doesn't work that way round here, I thought I'd > see if I could get an IAAL (as opposed to an IANAL :-) opinion on why > it's not needed.
We can exercise some discretion as to minor patches, but for larger contributions, especially for anything that could stand alone, nowadays, ASF PMCs can and do ask for CLAs. It's just a matter of degree. I very much doubt that anyone on legal-discuss@ is going to say that it's wrong to require a CLA for everything that goes into the codebase. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
