On 2/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Definitely interesting. There are some overlaps with what Shale does, > > especially in the Shale Tiger Extensions[1] feature that lets you use > > annotations to register components/converters/validators, define view > > controllers, and declare managed beans. > > Right! That was what I was thinking first. But IMHO I like more the > Shale way, since you don't need no interface or superclass. > > > You will notice that annotated navigation is not on that list ... and > > Really ? I have to search my older struts dev email. I am thinking, > I have seen something like that in this list.
You're undoubtedly correct in remembering that the idea of annotated navigation was proposed ... but you'll also find that my reply was "I'm not a believer" :-) -Matthias Craig > philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that > > way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished > technically. > > > > Regards, > > > Matthias > > > > > > [1] - > http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html > > > > > > Craig > > > > [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
