Sounds OK to me - the voting on plans seems to have been a recent addition. I have something almost ready for Bug 38749 - which is in extras. I guess from this, thats not affected as this is action only?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38749 Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:28 PM Subject: Bylaws and Releases Having volunteered as release manager Struts Action 1.3.1, I'm reading the instructions. :) The bylaws [1] say that release plans must be announced on the dev list and that each issue is decided by lazy majority. I interpret this to mean that I can [ANNOUNCE] the release plan and the intended date, then proceed with tagging the repository and creating the test build, as long as -1's do not outnumber +1's. In practice, of course, any -1 is likely to stop the process. But that's not what has happened for recent releases-- [VOTE]s have been called to confirm the release plans themselves, and then again for the quality of the proposed releases. Am I interpreting the bylaws correctly? Is there an unwritten rule about when you should call a vote on a release plan? [1] http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html Thanks, -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
