On 3/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We need to fix /releases.html, which is inconsistent with recent > > history and sentiment. :) > > > > " The test build can be posted to the internal distribution directory > > (svn.apache.org/struts/) and announced to the Struts DEV and PMC lists > > (only!). Do not announce a test build on any other Apache lists or > > link to it from an Apache website. " > > +1 > > > > Back to my motives: Shale likely won't make it past alpha until > > Standalone Tiles does. > > > > Just so nothing comes up at the last minute, the as-yet-unnanounced > > intent is to do another Shale build, and assuming it is graded alpha, > > to distribute it from www.apache.org/dist/java-repository, which will > > replicate to ibiblio. The way things stand, there will be no 'alpha' > > modifier in the filenames, just 'shale-test-1.0.1.jar', etc. > > Ummm, I don't believe we want to start using modifiers again. It would > just be shale-1.0.1.jar. The quality grade (including no grade) is > extracurricular from the distribution file name, allowing us to adjust > the grade based on actual experience.
+1. Now, if we were able to roll a tiles-1.0.0 first, and by some miracle > that ever went GA, then, from what you have said, then shale-1.0.1 > might be able to go GA too. Standalone Tiles is not very far into the proposed refactoring, and it would be a shame to miss out on the opportunity to clean that stuff up before a GA release. -Ted. Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
