On 3/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see the problem with Action2 either. Hopefully, we will > someday see an Action3 and Action4 too. > > But, regardless of what I think, I would suggest that we wait a few > days and give the other new committers a chance to chime in. Ian > indicated a preference for saf, and the other new committers might > have a preference too.
+0. Or +1 if I had time to volunteer. I could live with action2 as well. Now that I'm seeing this renaming from this perspective though, I'm wishing some of it mentions WebWork. In fact I wish we could do something like org.apache.struts.webwork. I don't know how that would look like, though. - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.webwork - WebWork* classes -> WebWork* - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts WebWork - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> webwork. - ww: tag prefix -> ww: That's my 2c. Like tm jee (TJ?), I'd be okay with any naming strategy the community settles on. Hubert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
