This may be a dumb suggestion but why not implement a lightweight action class that's in StrutsAction and then if a user chooses they can use the full support of XWork. I'm not sure where you draw the line (you'd probably want validation) but I cant see why you couldn't implement a few of the interfaces. This kind of goes along with the POJO support for actions in WW 2.2
- Eric On 3/29/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To add to that, Patrick and I were collaborating on "phase 2" type > features before we even thought of merging projects. After that > brainstorming session, I started talking to Patrick about one of the > ideas that came out of the conversion, like devMode, and Patrick > implemented it in WebWork. He also went on to create QuickStart, which > allows you to quickly prototype applications without a complication > step. These were the types of ideas we were wanting to explore in Ti - > ways to make the job easier for the developer. > > Don > > Ted Husted wrote: > > I think we're all still working off the original proposal. > > > > * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi > > > > Don is simply referring to "phase 2", while most of us are still > > focused on "phase 1". > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 3/30/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Don, I think this is totally at odds with a lot of the things I've been > >> reading lately. Granted its been hard to separate the facts from the > >> noise lately (through no fault of anyone involved with the merger), but > >> even still... > >> > >> Can I make a suggestion? Certainly for the sake of the users in both > >> communities, but also to be sure those doing the work are all on the > >> same page, I think it would be a good idea for someone to write up what > >> the plan actually is, and make sure everyone is on board with > it. Maybe > >> I'm speaking out of turn and such a thing already exists, but I really > >> believe a lot of people are thinking this is just a Webwork rebranding, > >> with some additions taken from Struts, and if that isn't the case I > >> think it would be prudent to have a document than anyone can point to > >> and say "that's what we're doing, that's the plan!". > >> > >> Frank > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
