Why would we want the Action/Shale frameworks closer. I thought you guys were into diversity, not just trying to sell JSF? Lord, if you bring Shale to WebWorks, then you will truly have destroyed any hope of Struts survival in any form, even WebWorks.
On 4/9/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Moving this aspect of the discussion from myfaces to struts list ...] > > On 4/7/06, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Covered here a bit: > > > > > http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jhook/archive/2006/03/the_new_servlet_1.html > > @Jacob: > > Great blog entry! > > @ Struts Dev: > > I recommend you check this out. Jacob outlines how its possible to > create a simple action oriented framework on top of the JSF API > without fussing with components. You really get a sense for how > powerful (and pluggable) the API really is. > > Maybe this a possible Action/Shale/MyFaces cooperation opportunity? > Maybe the Webwork stuff could take advantage of the EL and > NavigationHandler? Its not 100% JSF but it would bring the > Action/Shale frameworks a little closer together. > > Back at ApacheCon USA we talked about trying to work more closely > between the two frameworks. To me, this idea has some interesting > possibilities. I know there was some interest in the Shale dialog > stuff but why not get the impressive navigation and EL capabilities of > JSF for free? > > Sean > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
