On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We should
> also definitely include the 2.4 DTD, as that is now a popular platform.  To
> make the inclusion effective, though, we'll also want to make sure it gets
> registered with the Digester that processes config files -- otherwise,
> including it will not make any difference.

Oops.  For 2.4, it's a schema, not a dtd.  Does that change the answer?

--
Wendy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to