On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We should > also definitely include the 2.4 DTD, as that is now a popular platform. To > make the inclusion effective, though, we'll also want to make sure it gets > registered with the Digester that processes config files -- otherwise, > including it will not make any difference.
Oops. For 2.4, it's a schema, not a dtd. Does that change the answer? -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
