are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.

- Brett

On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Craig wrote
> > > I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
> > > these artifacts (although probably two sets ...
> >
> > Can we do this with custom assemblies?
>
> Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just
> copying files around.  The Javadoc tool needs to create the frames and
> indexes so that everything is linked together.
>
> I think it will need two <reportSet>s, so the Javadoc plugin runs
> twice with different configuration.  Maybe something like this, which
> runs both the regular Javadoc doclet and the UMLGraph one:
>    http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UMLGraph
>
> And here's a link to some work that I did last year, which includes
> pom.xml files and a script to rearrange Shale into Maven 2's preferred
> structure.  I stopped in late November, so it doesn't include Shale
> Tiger or anything after that.
>    http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ShaleMaven2#build
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to