are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module? This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
- Brett On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Craig wrote > > > I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of > > > these artifacts (although probably two sets ... > > > > Can we do this with custom assemblies? > > Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just > copying files around. The Javadoc tool needs to create the frames and > indexes so that everything is linked together. > > I think it will need two <reportSet>s, so the Javadoc plugin runs > twice with different configuration. Maybe something like this, which > runs both the regular Javadoc doclet and the UMLGraph one: > http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UMLGraph > > And here's a link to some work that I did last year, which includes > pom.xml files and a script to rearrange Shale into Maven 2's preferred > structure. I stopped in late November, so it doesn't include Shale > Tiger or anything after that. > http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ShaleMaven2#build > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
